PLOS Note: We use this blog, on occasion, to highlight authors and their research. Today, we shine the spotlight on this book published last week on PLOS ONE. The subject is close to our hearts. The author of the blog and the article is Marc-André Simard. He holds a doctorate. student in information sciences at the University of Montreal who works on open science and science policy.
The COVID-19 pandemic has reinforced the importance of faster and more effective dissemination of scholarly literature. At the start of the pandemic, several publishers, such as Springer-Nature, the American Association for the Advancement of Science (AAAS), and Elsevier, announced the opening of their COVID-19-related articles. However, it is unclear whether these articles will remain open to researchers and the public. For example, Elsevier mentioned that its Novel Coronavirus Information Center will be available “as long as needed”, hinting that these resources may one day be locked behind a paywall.
The Open Access Movement
The scientific community has long advocated for free and unrestricted access to scholarly literature. This movement towards free access was formalized through the Budapest Open Access Initiative in 2002. The idea behind the Open Access (OA) movement is that science is a public good that should be made available to everyone in order to remove some of the barriers technology and finance to science and to accelerate research and education across the planet. Over the past 20 years, several major initiatives have been developed around the world to support open access broadcasting. These include the UNESCO Recommendation on Open Science and Plan S, a European initiative that aims to make publicly funded research articles freely available online, without embargo and with transparent pricing.
What is the size of the free access?
Using Web of Science, a database that indexes publication and citation data from approximately 13,000 journals per year, and Unpaywall, an open database that tracks open access content from over 50,000 publishers and scientific repositories, we collected a dataset of 8,137,675 papers that were published between 2015 and 2019. We found that more than 40% of all scientific publications indexed in the Web of Science during this period were available open access at the time of our data collection, with shares ranging from 21% in the humanities to 50% in medicine and health. science (Figure 1).
Figure 1. Share of open access articles by discipline.
Is open access really important for low-income countries?
Scientific publishing is a lucrative business. Since the early 2000s, more than half of scientific articles have been published by the so-called “publisher oligopoly”, which is making record profits. Participating in science is also expensive: to have access to the latest scientific discoveries, it is often necessary to pay subscription fees to journals so high that even some of the richest universities in the world have decided to unsubscribe. Low-income and developing countries are particularly vulnerable to these price dynamics.
Using the World Bank’s classification of countries by income and Web of Science author affiliation data, we examined the relationship between income level and 1) open access publication and 2) references made to open access literature. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate countries’ open access publications and references relative to the global average. Our data shows that low-income and lower-middle-income countries, particularly in sub-Saharan Africa, tend to publish and use open access literature more than the rest of the world. However, upper-middle-income countries use open access literature less than the rest of the world, while open access practices vary considerably in high-income countries.
Figure 2. Normalized map of the number of open access publications by country. Green indicates a country is above the world average and brown indicates a country is below the world average.
Figure 3. Normalized map of the number of references made to open access by country. Green indicates a country is above the world average and brown indicates a country is below the world average.
These results show that countries in sub-Saharan Africa publish and cite open access literature at a higher rate than the rest of the world. At the same time, we found that the Middle East and Asia are the regions with the lowest proportion of open access publications and open access usage. This could be explained by the fact that most publishers provide publication fee waivers for low-income countries, but not or only partially for middle-income countries. Ultimately, our study highlights national differences in OA adoption and leads us to believe that more OA initiatives at institutional, national, and international levels are needed to support wider adoption of OA. open research.